Neoliberalism, Accountability, and Reform Failures in Emerging Markets

The agenda of neoliberal market reform known as the Washington Consensus, which was meant to turn around the economies of developing and post-Communist countries and provide the bedrock of economic success on which stable democracies could be built, has largely proved to be a failure, with Russia and many Latin American countries like Argentina left in severe economic crisis by the end of the 1990s. Some proponents of neoliberal reform, such as Anne Krueger, have attributed this failure to the piecemeal and incomplete implementation of reform measures, while others, including Nobel Prize economist and former World Bank vice president Joseph Stiglitz, have pointed to technical flaws in the policies as the reason for failure. With both of these assessments focused narrowly on economic factors, Luigi Manzetti wants to highlight the crucial importance of political institutions and processes to a fully adequate explanation. His argument is that the ideology of neoliberal reform, rooted in the theories of Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman, assumed political checks and balances that did not exist in many of these countries undergoing market reform, and that only by taking political accountability as an influential variable in the equation for success can we really understand what happened. Where accountability was weak, patterns of corruption, collusion, and patronage worked to undermine the intended aims of market reform. Manzetti uses both large-n statistical analyses and small-n case studies (of Argentina, Chile, and Russia) to provide empirical evidence for his argument.